Skip to content
Rosso & ScanavinoFamily Farms
Evidence

Four reports on one sample.

Three NviroTek Wynland laboratory reports and one independent interpretation, all on sample AF4_1, drawn 30 June 2026 and transcribed here with the accreditation state marked per row.

0.044% N
Not a nutrient product
Nitrogen by mass.
421.5 mg/L at density 0.9543 g/cm3. S26/3362
>30million cfu/g
Living bacteria per gram
Above the plate method's ceiling, so the count itself is unknown.
M26/9725
952bacterial taxa
516 resolved to species
16S sequencing. M26/9726
6of 6
Cautions published verbatim
Every point of attention raised. Eco Veritas page 12
Provenance

Where the sample came from.

No document in the set names the site or the container the sample came from, so those two rows read Not recorded rather than being filled in from somewhere else.

Read this panel as sample data, not as the specification of a product you would buy. The finished-product panel on a retail batch is commissioned.

AF4_1

Sample AF4_1

Received by NviroTek Wynland Laboratories on 2026-06-30. Reported 2026-07-03 to 2026-07-14, across the four documents.

Sample ID
AF4_1
Taken from
Not recorded
Taken by
Sampling by client
Date taken
2026-06-30
Submitted by
Life Agriscience (Pty) Ltd, representative Makda Mahrai
Laboratory
NviroTek Wynland Laboratories, Wellington, in collaboration with Af4rica Lab
Interpretation by
Elrica de Necker, SACNASP registration 139526, for Van Den Berg Farming
Collection site
Not recorded
Batch
Not recorded
Composition

Molybdenum is high and copper is absent.

A living ferment, not a fertilizer. This panel describes batch AF4_1.

1,690ug/L
Molybdenum, very high
Outside the schedule. Eco Veritas page 6
<0.10mg/L
Copper, not detected
Below the detection limit. Inside the schedule

A wide molybdenum to copper ratio can induce copper deficiency in ruminants. That is why the pasture caution below matters on grazing land and nowhere else.

Chemistry report S26/3362, sample AF4_1, all twenty six analytes as reported

P (Phosphorous)
mg/L
Result
16.52
Method
C102
SANAS schedule
Outside
S (Sulphur)
mg/L
Result
29.34
Method
C102
SANAS schedule
Outside
Density
g/cm3
Result
0.9543
Method
C143
SANAS schedule
Outside
WS-Total Solid
%
Result
0.12
Method
Not recorded
SANAS schedule
Outside
pH (25°C)
units
Result
7.96
Method
C101
SANAS schedule
Inside
EC (25°C)
mS/m
Result
374.00
Method
C105
SANAS schedule
Inside
NO3-N (Nitrate as N)
mg/L
Result
2.7
Method
C106
SANAS schedule
Outside
NO2-N (Nitrite as N)
mg/L
Result
0.04
Method
C121
SANAS schedule
Outside
NH4-N (Ammonium as N)
mg/L
Result
244.00
Method
C109
SANAS schedule
Inside
Ca (Calcium)
mg/L
Result
105.64
Method
C102
SANAS schedule
Inside
Mg (Magnesium)
mg/L
Result
34.57
Method
C102
SANAS schedule
Inside
K (Potassium)
mg/L
Result
216.78
Method
C102
SANAS schedule
Inside
B (Boron)
mg/L
Result
<0.10
Method
C102
SANAS schedule
Inside
Cu (Copper)
mg/L
Result
<0.10
Method
C102
SANAS schedule
Inside
Fe (Iron)
mg/L
Result
0.89
Method
C102
SANAS schedule
Inside
Mn (Manganese)
mg/L
Result
0.18
Method
C102
SANAS schedule
Inside
Zn (Zinc)
mg/L
Result
<0.10
Method
C102
SANAS schedule
Inside
As (Arsenic)
ug/L
Result
<10.00
Method
C102
SANAS schedule
Outside
Cd (Cadmium)
ug/L
Result
<3.00
Method
C102
SANAS schedule
Outside
Co (Cobalt)
ug/L
Result
<10.00
Method
C102
SANAS schedule
Outside
Cr (Chromium)
ug/L
Result
<10.00
Method
C102
SANAS schedule
Outside
Hg (Mercury)
ug/L
Result
<6.00
Method
C102
SANAS schedule
Outside
Mo (Molybdenum)
ug/L
Result
1690.00
Method
C102
SANAS schedule
Outside
Ni (Nickel)
ug/L
Result
14.44
Method
C102
SANAS schedule
Outside
Pb (Lead)
ug/L
Result
<10.00
Method
C102
SANAS schedule
Outside
Nitrogen
mg/L
Result
421.50
Method
C159
SANAS schedule
Outside

Eleven of the twenty six analytes sit inside the laboratory’s schedule of accreditation, fifteen outside. A result printed as less than a value is below that analyte’s detection limit. Analyte names carry the report’s own spelling. Interpretation sits outside the accreditation scope. NviroTek Wynland report S26/3362, pages 1 and 2.

Microbiology

Living cells, and the DNA behind them.

Culture counts cells that grew. Sequencing reads DNA, which is not the same as alive.

Culture, report M26/9725.

Total plate count reports as greater than 30,000,000 cfu/g. That is the method’s upper reporting ceiling, not a measurement: the true count is unknown.

Culture microbiology report M26/9725, sample AF4_1

Yeast
cfu/g
Result
10
SANAS schedule
Inside
Total Plate Count
cfu/g
Result
>30000000
SANAS schedule
Inside
Mould
cfu/g
Result
3200
SANAS schedule
Inside

All three sit inside the laboratory's schedule of accreditation. Source: NviroTek Wynland report M26/9725, page 1 of 1.

Sequencing, report M26/9726.

952 bacterial taxa, 516 of them resolved to species. Both counts print, and read depth sits beside the diversity indices because an index means little without it.

Diversity metrics as printed in the Eco Veritas interpretation, page 7

Richness (number of taxa)
Bacteria 16S
952
Fungi ITS
22
Meaning
How many different taxa
Shannon index
Bacteria 16S
4.49
Fungi ITS
0.07
Meaning
Overall diversity, higher is better
Pielou evenness
Bacteria 16S
0.65
Fungi ITS
0.02
Meaning
How evenly distributed, 1 is perfect
Fisher's alpha
Bacteria 16S
232.28
Fungi ITS
2.56
Meaning
Richness estimate
Total reads
Bacteria 16S
13 762
Fungi ITS
13 887
Meaning
Sample size

The interpretation report states total bacterial reads of 13 762 in its diversity table and 13 327 in its species appendix, and the appendix percentages are calculated on 13 327. We have asked the laboratory to reconcile the two figures. Sources: Eco Veritas page 7, section 4.1 and Eco Veritas page 15, Appendix B footer.

The seven genera the interpretation tables.

Percent of total bacterial reads, page 9. Two carry a hygiene flag and both are drawn at their real size.

  • Pseudomonas19.7%

    Very diverse. Many species (e.g. P. putida) are well-known root-promoting bacteria: solubilise phosphate, produce siderophores, suppress disease. Largely positive.

    Siderophores are the compounds that scavenge iron.

  • Aeromonas9.8%

    Water bacteria from organic-rich, low-oxygen environments. A. hydrophila is an opportunistic pathogen (hygiene concern), not a plant pathogen.

  • Comamonas9.1%

    Environmental bacteria that break down organic compounds and are involved in denitrification. Neutral-beneficial.

  • Flavobacterium7.9%

    Break down organic material, recycle nutrients. Mostly neutral-beneficial.

  • Acinetobacter7.8%

    Mixed: some solubilise phosphate / promote growth, others are opportunistic.

  • Macellibacteroides2.3%

    A strict anaerobic fermenter, confirms the product's fermentation origin.

  • Citrobacter1.8%

    Enteric bacteria (bacteria that normally live in the digestive tract of humans & animals); can fix N and solubilise P, but are faecal-associated/opportunistic (hygiene concern).

    N is nitrogen, P is phosphorus. Faecal-associated is a hygiene flag, not a plant disease.

Beneficial or decomposerOpportunistic, monitorMixedFermenterBars to a 20 percent scale

This is a microbe-rich product likely manufactured mainly through fermentation processes. There is no dominance of the classic soil inoculants such as Bacillus, Azospirillum, Rhizobium, Lactobacillus, Trichoderma or mycorrhiza. This means the product can typically be used to build and support general microbial life in the soil, not to apply specific target species. (Eco Veritas page 9.)

Interpretation

Every caution the interpreting scientist raised.

All six points of attention from page 12, in the report’s own words.

  1. High ammonium

    Can scorch seed/roots if undiluted; can cause odour & temporary N loss

    Manageable with dilution
  2. High salt load (EC)

    Repeated undiluted use can build up soil salt in dry regions

    Manageable with dilution & water
  3. Mo high / Cu absent

    Wide Mo:Cu imbalance; on pasture, high Mo can cause copper deficiency in ruminants (molybdenosis)

    Monitor on pasture
  4. Opportunistic bacteria

    Aeromonas/Citrobacter, handling hygiene (wear gloves); not plant pathogens

    Low risk, hygiene
  5. Aflatoxin-forming Aspergillus DNA

    Food-safety flag on grain/feed, but DNA only, very low

    Low risk; exercise caution
  6. Nutritionally incomplete

    Low P; no measurable Cu, Zn, B; low carbon/solids

    Limits value as a standalone product
Within a biological approach: yes, as a way to support living microbial activity. On its own, the product is unbalanced and low in plant nutrients, and will therefore not replace a complete fertility program.
Eco Veritas AF4_1, page 12, on whether it is worth applying

Page 13 calls the bacterial profile a broad environmental and fermentation mix rather than a purpose-built beneficial-microbe inoculant. That is what the sequencing found.

On edible grain/feed: Avoid application close to harvest time. Because of the opportunistic bacteria and the aflatoxin-forming Aspergillus DNA, it is safer to spray early in the season (well before grain-fill), or rather to use it as a soil application instead. (Page 11, section 5.2.)

Two samples

The safety sheet describes a different sample.

Both are published so the difference is visible rather than buried.

Parameters measured on both samples, side by side

pH at 25 C
units
Sludge tank 26-06018
8.8
Sample AF4_1
7.96
Electrical conductivity
mS/m
Sludge tank 26-06018
493
Sample AF4_1
374.00
Ammonium nitrogen
mg/L
Sludge tank 26-06018
494
Sample AF4_1
244.00
Phosphorus
mg/L
Sludge tank 26-06018
130
Sample AF4_1
16.52
Potassium
mg/L
Sludge tank 26-06018
351
Sample AF4_1
216.78
Calcium
mg/L
Sludge tank 26-06018
181
Sample AF4_1
105.64
Manganese
ug/L
Sludge tank 26-06018
16 726
Sample AF4_1
180
Iron
ug/L
Sludge tank 26-06018
19 379
Sample AF4_1
890
Aluminium
ug/L
Sludge tank 26-06018
7 976
Sample AF4_1
Not recorded

Sludge tank 26-06018: Waterlab report 155065 for La Pieus Aqua, issued 2026-05-04, reproduced in the Magic Power technical SDS on pages 7 and 8. Sample AF4_1: NviroTek Wynland report S26/3362, page 1 of 2. The two laboratories name ammonium and phosphorus differently, and manganese and iron are converted from mg/L to ug/L so the columns compare. Aluminium is not on S26/3362.

26-06018 is tank sludge, which the safety data sheet itself says is not the final bottled concentrate. AF4_1 is the liquid product. Every parameter measured on both reads lower in AF4_1.

Safety

Handling.

ClassificationSDS section 2
Not hazardous under GHS on the information available and the intended agricultural use. No signal word, no pictogram.
Gloves and eyesSDS section 8
Nitrile, PVC or rubber gloves for prolonged handling. Glasses or goggles when pumping, mixing or decanting.
AerosolsSDS sections 2 and 8
Avoid mist during bulk transfer. Anyone with a compromised immune system should avoid contact and inhaled mist.
StorageSDS section 7
5 C to 35 C, sealed in the original container, out of direct sunlight. Protect from freezing.
Do not mix withSDS sections 7 and 10
Strong acids, oxidisers, disinfectants, chlorine, peroxide, biocides. They kill the biological activity that is the point of it.
Spills and waterwaysSDS sections 6 and 13
Spilled liquid is slippery. Contain it, absorb with sand or soil, keep undiluted quantities out of drains and streams.

That sheet is version 1.0, written against the sludge-tank sample. It is being reissued against the finished-product analysis, and no download is offered until that version exists.

Application

How it goes on.

Soil and fertigation. These rates are a protocol target, not a trial result.

In the furrow

15 to 25 L/ha banded at planting, diluted at least 1:10, about 5 cm to the side of or below the seed and never touching it. Ammonium reads 244 mg/L, conductivity 374 mS/m.

FishIt integration guide section 1. Eco Veritas page 11, section 5.1

Through the line

An injection concentration, not a volume per hectare, so the annual volume follows the irrigation. Filter, test compatibility, flush afterwards. Season cap 30 L/ha.

Magic Power technical SDS page 9. Season cap is programme design

No foliar rate

The safety data sheet lists foliar use under uses advised against until phytotoxicity, pathogen and residue testing complete. That testing is commissioned.

SDS section 1 and page 9

No yield trial has completed. The full protocol and what a grower signs up to are on the trials page.

Documents

The four reports.

The originals go out once both South African counterparties have signed a release.

  1. S26/3362

    Chemistry

    NviroTek Wynland Laboratories, Wellington

    Twenty six analytes, eleven of them inside the schedule of accreditation.

    Received 2026-06-30
    Reported 2026-07-10

  2. M26/9725

    Microbiology, culture

    NviroTek Wynland Laboratories, Wellington

    Three culture results: plate count above the reporting ceiling, yeast 10 cfu/g, mould 3,200 cfu/g.

    Received 2026-06-30
    Reported 2026-07-03

  3. M26/9726

    Microbiology, DNA sequencing

    NviroTek Wynland Laboratories, Wellington

    Bacterial 16S and fungal ITS sequencing. 952 bacterial taxa, 516 resolved to species.

    Received 2026-06-30
    Reported 2026-07-14

  4. Eco Veritas AF4_1

    Independent interpretation

    Eco Veritas, Elrica de Necker, SACNASP 139526

    Sixteen pages reading the three laboratory reports together. Its six points of attention are published in full above.

    Received: not recorded
    Reported 2026-07-14

This test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. That is why no facsimile of a report page appears here.

NviroTek Wynland Laboratories confirms report numbers directly.
+27 21 873 3514
reception.w@nvirotek.co.za
54 Church Street, Wellington 7655, South Africa

Read the reports yourself.

The pack is the three NviroTek reports, the Eco Veritas interpretation and the sequencing workbook. Tell us who is reviewing.